I would like to take a minute today on my blog, to comment on a report that I have seen being heavily circulated to publishers, and print media senior managers. The report is called ‘The 2007 NNN Integrated Newspaper Footprint Study’ and it was commissioned by the Newspaper National Network (NNN). The NNN is an organization, owned by newspapers and newspaper associations. Their core mandate is to help advertisers find the right newspaper buy, for their advertising media mix. In essence then, they do great things for print media, primarily because they are print media, by ensuring advertisers understand the benefits. But, having said that, I do believe the report they released, showed their industry segment bias, in obvious ways.
The report relishes in the fact that 81% of newspaper website users, still read the print version of the newspaper. Don’t get me wrong. I see how this can be an adorning fact for print media. It encourages those who have not spent the time and effort on their websites to do so, because the risk seems minimum. It puts to rest, any internal questions about self-erosion, and so on. Where the report failed its audience, in my opinion, was in not taking a look at the total picture.
Clear, good I get it – 81% still read the print version of the newspaper, but how do we address the flat earnings, the decline in overall readers, the increase in online news source competitors and new sources for commercial advertisers that actually work. My fear is, the report puts print media in a sense of comfort that it has no business being in.
Trends show that less people are subscribing to newspapers daily and are reverting to purchasing it only once weekly, if at all. These now, sporadic purchases are included in readership stats, which sometimes skew results and perhaps this was the fact here with the NNN report. Nonetheless, the more infrequent print media purchases and overall lessened readership have, as we all know, led to the erosion of newspaper revenues. Even though some say print losses are being quieted, with online readership, it is important to note that publishers struggle to monetize online advertising to make up for their print losses. So, what does the erosion in ‘print-everything’ mean: its time to re-think business imperatives? Below are a few of many ideas:
Covering the Cost of Traditional Journalist
Contract community freelance journalists to write compelling pieces for the newspaper. With all of the blogs and micro news sites created by independents, the choices are abundant, making it easy pickings for a print publisher to do so. Employing a community freelance writer or blogger on contract, can be done at a fraction of the cost demanded by a full time, on staff journalist. If this suggestion scares you because of quality, relax. Have you taken a look at news stories online, on newspaper sites? Their quality has eroded, not to a detrimental level, but the race is on to get cutting edge news released to the public. This leaves less time for copy editing.
Creative Commercial Advertising Online
Let’s face it, the biggest monetary gain for newspapers online will have to come from their commercial advertisers – and I think we all get that. Where I think newspapers often drop the ball, is with the positioning of advertisements online. Reports show that less and less people click on banners and that many readers find pop ups or oddly placed tile ads intrusive. Newspapers need to take notice that social networking sites, such as Facebook (100,000 new users per day), have opened up their online real estate to commercial advertisers (and classified listings). To compete, Newspapers will need to find clever ways of integrating their client ads into their content searches, to increase click throughs.
Community Supplements (Geographically and Group segmented)
I say it all the time – although results seem grim for major daily newspapers, the smaller community papers are doing well. Local or community publications are expected to grow over the next two years by over 4%. Adding more supplemented, newsprint, community publications to a newspapers suite of products, would be a great longevity asset.
Reports such as the NNN’s could be both beneficial and detrimental to its audience. Complete understanding of the market overview is required by a reports reader, to ensure decisions are not made in silo, but are made given the state of the complete market.
The street consistently posts declines in earnings for the newspaper industry and I expect this will continue to some extent. But declines can be managed through increased site traffic leading to better monetized commercial advertising. Declines can also be quieted if newspapers can gain market share from those who do not frequent their sites today.
Publishers and senior leadership need to be concerned about stats pertaining to, growth of online only publishers, regional market share, social media growth and applications, and total market adoption of online news and classified sources. Keeping the above imperatives in mind, will allow publishers to keep an active pulse on their business and the markets they play in.
written by Beverly Crandon
Recent Comments