Newspaper Web sites have been labeled the equalizer to combat falling circulation rates, but a recent report from the Readership Institute made it clear that in the grand scheme of things, newspaper sites and their penetration have not increased in some very important metric areas, since 2005.
Readership.org, supported by personnel from North Western Education, completed a survey of 3,072 individuals across 100 DMA’s (Designated Market Areas). The survey respondents were asked questions primarily relating to newspaper Web sites and their frequency of usage. The respondents ranged between heavy print newspaper readers, mild print newspaper readers, all the way through to those who have “never read a newspaper”.
When asked about their newspaper Web site visitation, only 21% of respondents said they had visited their local newspaper site, within the past 30 days, this opposed to 15% in 2003, when the Readership Institute first started to conduct this survey annually. The bad news for newspapers however, is that although the numbers of people gravitating to their Web sites have increased, the user engagement levels have not. They have remained the same since 2005. This metric is somewhat disappointing, given the changes to user expectations and general online functionality, even within the past two years much less three. It becomes apparent that for many local newspapers, knowing that they at least have a Web compliment is enough. The success of many pure play sites that dabble in the same type of advertising that the dailies do, should be proof enough that the readership profile, when online, has changed and will continue to change. It is not enough to remain content with just ensuring your print content appears online.
As we’ve stated before on this blog, publishers need to look at their Web property as an extension to their brand. An opportunity to attract a new audience and with that, new advertising dollars.
A full copy of the Readership Institute report could be downloaded here.
written by Beverly Crandon
Recent Comments